Tag: hoax

Media agrees, hoaxes do exist: they only disagree on the number of hoaxes

False news is a fact. Hoaxes do exist. The disagreement is about what percentage of the news is fake news.

Anyone who claims some news is fake, is just expressing a mainstream point of view. The discussion between mainstream and alternative media is about the extend to which news is controlled and fake.

We are under the impression, that a) almost all mainstream news worldwide is controlled and b) about half the news should be considered fake news. It is even worse for alternative media. People who realize mainstream news is tainted, might turn to alternative media, to learn later on the same applies to alternative media: mostly controlled and fake.

Op 7 augustus 2019 adviseerden wij om te preppen en werden we uitgelachen: Corona

https://demuren.wordpress.com/2019/08/07/preppers-dat-zijn-geen-gekkies-maar-mensen-die-voor-de-zekerheid-een-voorraad-voedsel-in-de-kast-hebben/

  • Wij zijn er niet van overtuigd, dat de “mega” Corona-uitbraak echt is. Het kan een hoax zijn. Er bestaan natuurlijk griepvirussen zoals iedereen weet, maar de berichtgeving over deze Corona-uitbraak is wel erg uitbundig.
  • Ons advies: geloof niet alles in de media, maar geloof wel in werken aan je gezondheid!
  • Wij zijn er wél van overtuigd, dat ons de komende jaren wat rare gebeurtenissen te wachten staan. Het is een kleine moeite om je daarop voor te bereiden.
  • Wij adviseren lezers, om de voorraadkast in de keuken aan te vullen, niet vanwege een realistisch gevaar van het Coronavirus, maar om op alles voorbereid te zijn.

De supermarkten laten lege vakken zien, daar waar normaal de basisproducten staan. Dat kan komen, door hamstergedrag van de consument. Het kan ook komen, doordat de supermarkten zelf de vakken niet aanvullen, met als doel paniek te zaaien. Lege schappen, het maakt dat consumenten geloven dat hamsteren nodig is. Resultaat? Morgen gaan veel mensen hamsteren (juist, vooral in het weekend!!)!

Lege schappen maakt lege schappen. Wie het weet mag het zeggen.

Het is sowieso geen slecht idee om altijd een volle voorraadkast in de keuken te hebben, voor extra eten, water, vitaminepillen en wc-papier. Hierdoor ben je beter bestand tegen tegenslagen. Maar of deze crisis echt of gecreeerd is? Wij weten het niet.

DSCI8719 - Copy

Het is een rare actie marketingtechnisch, om een koelkast met Budweiser en Corona bier bij de kassa van de supermarkt te zetten: “King of beers”. 

Crucifixion in Kiev – Kruisiging in Kiev (24 April 2015) – Who made this video? (part 5)

SAMENGEVAT, DIT IS GEEN ECHTE EXECUTIE. DE MAN IS ZO OPGEHANGEN, DAT HIJ FYSIEK NIETS TE LIJDEN HEEFT. HIJ DRAAGT EEN CORSET; HEEFT EEN WIT OPSTAPJE OM OP TE STAAN; EN DE ARMEN ZIJN HORIZONTAAL VASTGEMAAKT.

How exactly is he attached to the cross? Execution style?  NO!

On April 24 2015 in Ukraine, allegedly a man was crucified by what seems to be militairy men. Since we do not know the origin of the video, we can not report on its meaning yet. We do have some serious questions about the authenticity.

Peter_Gertner_-_Crucifixion_-_Walters_37246In previous blogs we already showed how the background is fake and so is the fire. This article discusses the crucifixion itself.

Crucifixion is a slow death, which usually takes many hours to even several days. As the crucified is hanged by both arms (and spread), there is continuous stretch on the upperbody. This can lead to several causes of death, among which suffocation. When the feet are attached to the cross too, it will take longer to die, as the hanged man can lift himself up and release stress on the upperbody.

What did we notice about the crucifixion in the Ukraine video?

  1. He is hanged in a way that avoids the strech on the upperbody typical for crucifixion.
  2. It seems he is wearing a special harnas to assure he is properly attached to the cross.
  3. Despite the nails through his hands, he does not bleed.

Below we will discuss the above aspects in more detail.

1. Hanged in a way that avoids strech on upperbody

Crucifixion is a slow death. Being hanged by the hands this way, stretches the upperbody. This creates all sorts of problems that can cause death, including suffrication, heart faillure, shock, pulmonary embolism etc. The problems are more severe (and death sooner), when the feet are not attached to the cross. When feet are nailed to the cross too, a hanged man can release pressure on the upperbody every now and then, by lifting / pushing the body upwards with the feet. In this case: feet are not nailed to the cross.

vlcsnap-2015-04-29-23h14m55s741The executioners made a small step on the cross (it is white in the picture to the right), for the hanged man to put his feet on! The small step is exactly where his feet are. We can only see where it is, before the cross is raised. Why would they go through the trouble of building in a small step? It releases suffering yes, but the Romans did it so the hanged man would live (suffer) longer. Why secretly release the pain, when minutes later the hanged man is “burned”? There is no reason to do so, unless the video is fake. The small step for his feet, assure there is not too much pressure on his upperbody. Again, it shows how the video is fake.

vlcsnap-2015-04-26-23h03m52s980The executioners even taped the arms of the hanged man on two locations: near the wrist (to keep the hand in place) en near the shoulder (to release pressure on the upperbody). The whole idea of a crucifixion is to put pressure on the upperbody by hanging the two arms in a 70 degrees angle. By attaching the arms horizontal with support (tape) near the shoulder, there is hardly any unusual stretch on the upperbody. This is no crucifixion. They did everything to make it comfortable for the hanged man.

2. The hanged man is wearing a special harnas

This is no crucifixion. In fact, the first thing the “executioners” do when they attach him to the cross, is do something to his back. It is as if they hook a harnas between his shoulder blades to the cross. At 0:28s in the video, we even hear a click. What can that be? I am beginning to think this is when they attach the hanged man’s harnas to the cross.

vlcsnap-2015-04-28-19h35m15s788 vlcsnap-2015-04-29-23h14m55s741

We can even see small parts of the harnas, in below pictures! We can see something black just below his armpit. Moreover, at 2:49s in the video, it becomes clear they have the man’s shirt wrapped around the cross. Why would they do that? The idea of hanging someone onto a cross, is how the body is hanged by two arms, with minimum support for the rest of the body! What are they covering up? It didnot get wrapped around the cross for no reason at all. And I also noted some odd shape underneath the blue shirt, just below his ribs. He is wearing something under his blue shirt for sure.

vlcsnap-2015-04-29-23h24m55s091 vlcsnap-2015-04-29-23h45m31s768

Now that is odd! It seems these men do everything to take care of proper ergonomics. This is no execution. They do everything to make him comfortable on that cross.

3. Despite nails through his hands, no blood31f5In5-+dL

When a nail is hammered through a hand, the hand bleeds. Many blood veins go through the hand: It is impossible not to damage any. Also, a hand is thin, so it will not likely be an internal bleeding. In this case we did not see any blood nor any swollen parts. So?

It again looks like a magic trick (picture to the right is a magic trick toy). In the video, it looks like half a nail attached to his hand palm. Both hands do not bleed. And remember, we did not see his hands in the entire video, untill after the “nailing him”. It seems more likely they attached half a nail with glue to his hands, before the camera work even started.

vlcsnap-2015-04-28-18h36m15s258We are not convinced. And notice how the hanged man screams all he can when being hammered to the cross, while he keeps quiet when the cross is raised to an upward position. If it would be real, once they have the nail through the hand (hitting it once or twice), it would not heart that much, when the nail is hammered further down into the cross itself (no new tissue is damaged). But raising the cross will put weight on the nailed hands and that will hurt like hell for sure!  (if the video would be real)

So here we are, with a fake background, fake crucifixion and fake fire. This is no execution. This is a propaganda movie.

Wij vragen ons af, kan Boris Nemtsov een fake liquidatie zijn?

Nemtsov might not have been assassinated in this (fake?) attack in Moscow.

On February 27 in 2015, politician Boris Nemtsov is reported to have been assassinated, while walking down the streets in the center of Moscow. The liquidation raises many questions. 

There are various facts about what happened on February 27, leading to the conclusion the whole assassination is a strange event. We will not discuss again my previous blogs about the subject, presenting the same details of the fake assassination. 

Above you see two video’s. The first video has been presented to us in the media and shows the whole (fake?) assassination event. The second video is a close-up around 23.31:15.

The story is strange, especially the moment the actual shooting is supposed to have happened. It takes at least 2 to 3 seconds, to shoot 5-8 bullets. The red circle in the pictures shows the stairs the officials claim (formal story) the gunman was coming from (perhaps in reality, no-one is coming from the stairs, the gunman likely jumped off the snow wagon). The white circle highlights the gunman coming from behind the car. 

vlcsnap-2015-04-17-00h39m43s315 vlcsnap-2015-04-16-21h41m14s636

vlcsnap-2015-04-16-21h41m25s736 vlcsnap-2015-04-17-00h42m57s589

vlcsnap-2015-04-17-00h57m10s569 vlcsnap-2015-04-17-00h57m15s442

  • At 23.31:13 in the video, we see no gunman, a happily walking couple, and a snow wagon that is catching up with the couple (the wagon drives faster than they walk).
  • At 23.31:14 in the video, the snow wagon stops, as the happily walking couple is catching up with the wagon the next second (they are visible at 15s). At 14s neither the gunman nor the couple is visible. The gunman likely jumps off the snow wagon at 14s.
  • At 23.31:15, the snow wagon is standing still, as we see a glimpse of the couple walking forward in front of the wagon just before the white circle covers them up (and they are normally walking, it is seen at 1:06 and 1:54 in the 2nd video). This must have been the exact time Nemtsov should have been shot, as the person in the white coat is seen on the same spot a few seconds later, supposedly next to his body at 21s in the 1st video above. Next to the lamp post at 21s we see some additional dark ‘shades’ (left).
  • At 23.31:16, the gunman is already visible behind the wagon, walking at least 1,5m on the car lane, with the snow wagon between him and Nemtsov. It is impossible for the gunman to shoot Nemtsov at 23.31:16s. The snow wagon is increasing speed again.
  • At 23.31:17, the gunman is at least 3 or 4 meters onto the car lane walking towards the escape car. The snow/cleaning wagon is moving forward.
  • At 23.31:21, the white coat is visible again, after the snow wagon has driven beyond the location of the so-called assassination. She is in the same spot as she was at 15s.

Now, what do the media reports say? Someone heard at least 7/8 gunshots. They found 6 cartridges on the pavement, shot from a Makarov handgun. And Nemtsov was hit 4 times. Where in the timeline could Nemtsov have been shot? Only at exactly 23.31:15s, though this is a stretch, because 1 second later the gunman was visible at least 1.5m on the car lane (and it takes 1 second to walk 1.5m, when you walk fast). Ask any expert: to shoot 6 to 8 bullets with a semi-automatic weapon, will at least take 2 to 3 seconds (for a trained professional). There is simply no time on the timeline (around 23.31:15) when Nemtsov could have been shot on the location they claim he has been shot. Impossible. It takes an extremely well-trained professional to even simply a) jump off a snow wagon, b) throw 6 bullet cartridges on the ground and c) walk away [all between 23.31:14s and 23.31:16s].

Conclusion: He has not been shot on February 27 at 23.31h on the bridge. 

How did they likely do it? Making a few assumptions, this is our best guess.

  • Boris lying ground2They picked a location where the entire scene is caught on camera, yet the precise location of the body is not captured on camera.
  • The gunman jumps of the wagon at 23.31:14s and drops 6 cartridges, perhaps playing a voice recording of gun shots for the effect.
  • The large wagon is in front of the “assassination” when Nemtsov falls down. The escape wagon dims the headlights, to assure Nemtsov remains in the shadow for a few seconds.
  • Likely Nemtsov had a capsule in his mouth with a drug, that makes him go into a coma.
  • Nemtsov puts on a skin-like corset somewhere that evening, which also has fake bullet holes. It allows him to breathe softly without it being noticed. As he is only seen in the evening street light, they can get away with it, if the police and CSI’s on the scene are in on it. This does require someone who stays with Nemtsov at all times, to make sure no-one just walks by and touches him (who is not part of the set-up).
  • The first man on the scene (in the black coat) thus guarded Nemtsov and also likely dropped some blood, while the girlfriend is lured away by the snow wagon driver.
  • The traffic is blocked to assure no witnesses drive by the scene, until it is arranged.
  • The press is allowed close to the body (distance of 3 meters), so Nemtsov is clearly on display and there are no doubts about him being actually dead.

After studying all the evidence, we can do nothing else but bring up this question, even though many readers are likely not prepared to believe this.