The Economist (owned by Rothschild) makes a point of drawing a forecast every year for the year to come. Their predictions are not based on economic analysis, but rather based on insight in what is to be expected in terms of political change. Above the 2016 forecast.
They basically try and show off, how much power they have. At least, that is what “they say” online.
But do they really? Arenot political changes designed more than just one year in advance? Do we need to look further back to see if “they were right”. And if they were right, it of course means they are wrong.
Notice how everything in 2016 is supposed to be better? Smiling faces and a clear sun in the sky. Well, something tells me we still have the 2015 front page ahead of us. They have plans for the world, plans most people don’t like. These same people are smiling later on in “the world in 2016”. Is that a good sign? Smiling politicians? It likely means some lost a lot and others gained a lot. Both are still to come. In 2016. That’s what I expect. It will get nasty.
- Terror attacks are occuring more frequent.
- The EU is making European citizens not too happy.
Something will happen soon, either planned by them or not. It just will.
All I want is “freedom 4 Maud”. And of course: I don not want to be hit by any New World Order arrow myself, nor do I accept any further attacks on European soil. I am done with you guys. Cut the crap. Stop these hoax terror attacks. Stop attacking our citizen rights. Stop robbing European tax players in plain sight.
Yes, we are watching you too.