DWDD en Peter r. de Vries noemen prins Friso en Marianne Vaatstra in één (on)zin op nationale TV

http://dewerelddraaitdoor.vara.nl/media/303535 

Het nieuws is niet dat Wim Dankbaar is afgezeken op TV. Het nieuws is dat op de nationale TV een theorie is genoemd die ‘ook te belachelijk voor woorden’ is: prins Friso. Het nieuws is dat deze theorie genoemd is. Dat is opzienbarend.

———————————-

Overview Vaatstra murder case 1999-2013

On the morning of 1 May 1999, a young girl called Marianne Vaatstra was found dead in a grassland, brutally raped and murdered. The night before she had gone out in a nearby village with her boyfriend and some friends to celebrate the festival of Queens Day. This year, some-one has been convicted for the murder, after years of investigation. According to many citizens the man convicted can not be the murderer, as the police seems to have covered-up the murder from day one. Many say the police ignored evidence. The convicted man, a farmer called Jasper (who lives nearby the grassland where she was found) is said to have confessed to committing the murder after days of interrogation by the police. After a decade of speculations by civilian investigators, his confession was no reason to celebrate for the ‘civilian investigators’.

MarianneVaatstraIt is unlikely suspect Jasper actually committed the murder. Though the Ministry of Justice claims they have found a 100% DNA match, there is a lot of evidence that would suggest the story of Jasper ‘does not add up’. What is most remarkable, is that Jasper’s lawyer mr. Vlug is not doing anything to improve the position of his client, despite all the material available to him. Several law firms have spoken out in the media, to express their concern about how lawyer Vlug was handling the case. Even if Jasper is guilty, the lawyer’s approach was certainly not helping Jasper to a fair trial.

The evidence gathered by civilians supports a different theory: 1) Marianne never cycled home alone along the grassland where she was found; 2) the scene in the grassland suggests she was murdered somewhere else; 3) numerous eye witnesses support the scenario in which Marianne was abducted by car in the centre of Kollum (small village) by a group of at least 4 men who’s identities are known. These men already had a reputation of being involved in the sexual abuse of women in political asylum centers, activities apparently tolerated by the Ministry of Justice.

What is so special about this case? It seems the cover-up 1) started in the night she was murdered, 2) would require the involvement of several departments of the Ministry of Justice  3) and continues until today. 4) The lawyer defending the main suspect Jasper, has been in the news a lot and mainly gives statements that are harmful to his so-called client Jasper. 5) Up to today, the mainstream press is just printing the state press releases on this case, without asking too many difficult questions. Thus, somehow all powers in our society that are supposed to be balanced (according to the Trias Politica), simply do not do what the public would expect them to do to maintain a just society. The only question that still needs answering is: Who are powerful enough to coordinate all these activities of both the police, the Ministry of Justice, the mainstream press and Dutch law firms?

About MOL

Maud Oortwijn had been a target of organized gang stalking for many years. We believe this must stop, for her and for everyone else facing it.
Video | This entry was posted in Justitie, Koningshuis, Media, Waarheidscommissie and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to DWDD en Peter r. de Vries noemen prins Friso en Marianne Vaatstra in één (on)zin op nationale TV

  1. In welke hoek moeten we het zoeken:

    – Wie kan midden in de nacht op 1 mei 1999 de hoogste bazen van Justitie uit bed bellen? (En weet ook zeker dat deze hem/haar gaan helpen per direct om een doofpot op te zetten)
    – Zowel de misdaad als de doofpot zijn in zekere haast opgezet, omdat het op 30 april 1999 niet echt vlekkeloos is gelopen, met veel losse eindjes. Wel lijken er professionals aan het werk, die snel beschikken over oplossingsmiddelen om die losse eindjes weg te werken. Wie is arrogant en veeleisend genoeg om professionals te strikken voor een dergelijke zwaar-criminele haastklus?
    – Iemand van Justitie heeft enkele jaren geleden gezegd, dat deze zaak nooit opgelost zal worden. Waarom wist diegene dat zeker?
    – Wie kan iedere hoek van het Justitie apparaat binnen enkele uren na “de pijpen laten dansen van” in mei 1999 en kan dat nog steeds voor elkaar krijgen in 2013?
    – Wie is in staat om zowel Justitie, als media, als gerechtelijke macht, als advocaten te laten meewerken aan een knullige veroordeling van Jasper S.?

  2. Koos van Woudenberg says:

    Goedemorgen Vogeltjewatzingjelaat! Ik denk eigenlijk dat er niemand is die aan de hand van jouw vragenlijstje op een idee komt.

  3. kaskaas says:

    Dat was toen diezelfde gast als jij gezien hebt. Mensen zeggen Demmink. Die was toen klein in 1999, ma daanaa ineens niet.

    http://maudoortwijn.wordpress.com/2013/05/21/benk-korthals-kraait-de-haan-3-keer/

  4. Alle O.v.J.’s die grove fouten maken o.a. van Brummen in de Zandvoort affaire zitten nu op hoge posities bij het ministerie van justitie.

  5. ivo says:

    Verdiep je maar eens in het ‘ronde huis’

  6. Pingback: another reason to quit (life) | wankablecelebs2

  7. Wees blij says:

    jonge jonge jonge
    wat lijkt jan vlug toch op jan driessen van de mediaburo bij vondelpark

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.